autoseeker Advertise

Mazda CX-30 Mazda CX-5

Two cars on the same rows. The figures are all here, with their sources, so you can read them yourself and decide what matters.

Comparison table

18 of these rows differ. They sit at the top. Figures come straight from the makers, indicative. A bullet (•) marks a differing row.
Mazda CX-30 Mazda CX-5
Model years 2019-now 2017-now
From (indicative) € 31,490 € 38,990
Status Available Available
Fuel Petrol Petrol
RatingsRating figures: higher is better (scale 0-100). What each category measures is explained on the methodology page.
Reliability 80/100 82/100
Efficiency 62/100 55/100
Practicality 70/100 74/100
Value retention 68/100 n/a
Sustainability (environmental impact) 40/100 35/100
Combined efficiency rating – 58/100
Specifications
Power (hp) 122 165
0–100 km/h (s) 10.6 10.5
Top speed (km/h) 186 201
Length (mm) 4395 4575
Width (mm) 1795 1845
Height (mm) 1540 1680
Kerb weight (kg) 1395 1588
Consumption WLTP (l/100km) 6.2 7.4
Max. towing weight, braked (kg) 1200 1800
Boot (l) 430 510
Body style SUV SUV
Seats 5 5
Doors 5 5

OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure

Show sources and reference dates per rating
  • Mazda CX-30 · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (segment, Mazda platform since 2019) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-30 · Efficiency: Owner-reported l/100km vs WLTP 6.2 (public forums); naturally aspirated engine pushes up motorway consumption · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-30 · Practicality: Boot 430 l + 1,200 kg braked towing weight (B-SUV comparison, manufacturer figure) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-30 · Value retention: Residual-value indication from valuation guides, B-SUV segment (historical average) · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-30 · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure petrol + exhaust emissions (Euro 6d standard on current models), reference date 2026-05-21 · reference date 2026-05-21
  • Mazda CX-5 · Reliability: ADAC breakdown statistics 2025 (segment) + aggregated owner reviews + RDW recall data; mature platform since 2017 · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Combined efficiency rating: WLTP 7.4 l/100km petrol without hybridisation, relatively high for segment; editorial weighting · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Efficiency: Owner-reported l/100km vs WLTP 7.4, public forums · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Practicality: 510 l boot, 1,800 kg braked towing weight, editorial weighting of specs · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Value retention: Insufficient clear-cut residual-value data for this trim and reference date · reference date 2026-05-18
  • Mazda CX-5 · Sustainability (environmental impact): WLTP consumption manufacturer figure petrol + exhaust emissions (Euro-6d standard on current models), reference date 2026-05-21 · reference date 2026-05-21

Who they are

A short write-up on each car, one paragraph apiece. We describe them on their own terms rather than picking a winner.

Profile · e-Skyactiv-G 2.0 M Hybrid (DM, modeljaar 2024)

Mazda CX-30

Compact SUV between the Mazda2 and CX-5, on Mazda's Skyactiv-Vehicle Architecture. The 2.0 e-Skyactiv-G with 24V mild-hybrid delivers 122 hp and returns WLTP 6.2 l/100km. Strong points are the finish and the Mazda reliability reputation; weak point the motorway consumption.

Profile · KF, facelift (2024)

Mazda CX-5

Compact SUV with a Skyactiv-G petrol engine, KF generation with 2024 facelift. No hybrid or mild-hybrid drive in this version: WLTP consumption around 7.4 l/100km (manufacturer figure). 510 l boot, braked towing weight 1,800 kg. Indicative starting price; check the official configurator for the current figure.

Mazda CX-30 Specs & reviews Configure at Mazda
Mazda CX-5 Specs & reviews Configure at Mazda

Continue

+ Compare with another model

Both cars are already filled in — just add a third to compare.

Browse all comparisons

No tax or financial advice. Every figure shows its source and reference date. Always compare with an independent adviser and the official source. Source: OEM datasheets + RDW + ADAC (see methodology); rating and reference dates are listed per figure.